[Irtalk] Example: Open Access & scientific scrutiny
inacsmith at gmail.com
Fri Sep 26 06:25:02 SAST 2014
So important that research be open, so that - when we read any article - we
do not just accept it as the 'truth'. The scientific dialogue and
scientific scrutiny of a paper by more than only and editor and two
peer-reviewers should always be extended to the rest of the world.
*How to critique claims of a “blood test for depression”*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IRTalk