[Irtalk] Example: Open Access & scientific scrutiny

[Ina Smith]

So important that research be open, so that - when we read any article - we
do not just accept it as the 'truth'. The scientific dialogue and
scientific scrutiny of a paper by more than only and editor and two
peer-reviewers should always be extended to the rest of the world.

*How to critique claims of a “blood test for depression”*
http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2014/09/25/critique-claims-blood-test-depression/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lib.sun.ac.za/pipermail/irtalk/attachments/20140926/90d90e81/attachment.html>