[IRTalk] IR Software comparison by Unesco

[Hussein Suleman]

Hi Colleagues

I have to agree with Bruce.

Has anyone ever tried to recover metadata and digital objects from a 
repository where the operating system is no longer operational?  Or 
where the operating system cannot be run so all you have is a file-based 
backup of the data?  In such cases, most of the recommended systems fail 
quite miserably.

We do need to think of long term, maintenance, transfer, recovery, etc. 
when we evaluate repository tools. Or we should stop using the word 
preservation.

Regards,
    Hussein Suleman

-- 
Hussein Suleman, PhD
Head of Department and Associate Professor
Department of Computer Science, University of Cape Town
www.husseinsspace.com

On 2017/08/31 9:50 AM, Bruce Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have started editing a collection on ScienceOpen for Data Infrastructures
> https://www.scienceopen.com/collection/data-infrastructures
>
> One of the articles I added to this was
> "Open Source Software for Digital Preservation Repositories: a Survey"
> (https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06336)
> https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=933ee8dc-4123-47e8-8905-661cbaff70e2
>
> This seems to be the most recent survey on the topic. I have found all
> of these "surveys" to be biased and limited in scope, even though many
> of them purport to be objective studies. There is not enough weight
> given to the long-term operation and maintenance of these things, and
> no consideration of how they would exist in a wider data
> infrastructure environment. "Libraries" (using a wide meaning of
> "place where information and data is curated" need to talk to other
> parts of e-Infrastructure. Not many of these digital preservation
> repositories do that. Of course, my very opinion is also biased, so
> that that as you may.
>
> I would like to invite anyone who has scholarly material on this kind
> of  thing to suggest it  for the collection, and let  me know if you
> would like to write an editorial or a review (or just re-publish one
> you already have).
>
> Thanks !
> Bruce
>
> On 27 August 2017 at 18:48, Ina Smith <Ina at assaf.org.za> wrote:
>> A comparison of the 5 top IR software solutions by Unesco (2014)
>>
>> http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/news/institutional_repository_software.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> DSpace service providers: http://www.dspace.org/service-providers/
>>
>>
>>
>> DSpace hosted option: http://dspacedirect.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> Bepress Digital Commons https://www.bepress.com/ (Elsevier) – not Open
>> Source
>>
>>
>>
>> If you know of any more resent comparisons, please share …
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ina Smith
>>
>> Project Manager: African Open Science Platform
>> Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf)
>> DOAJ Ambassador, Southern Africa Region
>> LIASA Librarian of the Year 2016
>>
>>
>>
>>   http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-3668
>>
>>
>>
>> Switchboard: +27 12 349 6600
>>
>> Tel: +27 12 349 6641
>>
>> Fax: +27 (0) 86 576 9512
>>
>> Email: ina at assaf.org.za
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1st Floor Block A, The Woods, 41 De Havilland Crescent, Persequor Park
>>
>> Meiring Naudé Road, Lynnwood 0020, Pretoria, South Africa.
>>
>>
>>
>> PO Box 72135, Lynnwood Ridge 0040, Pretoria, South Africa.
>>
>>
>>
>> Website: www.assaf.org.za
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail
>> legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
>> The full disclaimer details can be found at
>> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRTalk mailing list
>> IRTalk at lists.lib.sun.ac.za
>> http://lists.lib.sun.ac.za/mailman/listinfo/irtalk
>>
>
>
>