[IRTalk] Moral dimensions of Open, part 2: “the public paid for it, so the public should have access” | Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week
hilton.gibson at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 13:32:04 SAST 2016
One of the most frequent arguments for open access is this: research is
funded primarily by the public — through taxes and charitable donations.
Therefore the public should have access to the resulting research.
On the face of it, this argument is unassailable. I can’t think of any
other area of government funded work that is handed over to corporations
for them to profit from. and unavailable to citizens without paying a
second time. The very idea sounds ridiculous.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IRTalk