[Irtalk] Open Access 2014: A Year that Data Cracked Through Secrecy and Myth | Absolutely Maybe
hilton.gibson at gmail.com
Tue Dec 30 15:14:39 SAST 2014
Scientists created a rod for their backs when they allowed the journals in
which their work is published to become the arbiters of its scientific
A small tier of journals locked behind expensive paywalls became the elite
of the elite, rejecting almost all the manuscripts received. That sends
scientists on a time-consuming cascade of submission and re-submission to
multiple journals. It delays access to research results and discussion for
many months – and costs other scientists millions of hours of
often-redundant review time.
This editorial peer review hasn’t been shown to reliably improve quality –
and high impact factor journals, inevitably, fail to ensure quality.
What’s more, by not publishing open access, scientists lose out on the very
things they really want: to be read, to be cited by other scientists, and
to have access to as much funding as possible. The cost of scientific
publishing keeps draining resources:
*“It turns out that scholarly publishing does not operate like a classic
market. For a number of reasons, no effective mechanisms for restraining
prices have emerged.”*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IRTalk