[Irtalk] Peer review — reviewed : Nature News & Comment

Hilton Gibson hilton.gibson at gmail.com
Wed Dec 24 19:49:37 SAST 2014

Using subsequent citations as a proxy for quality, the team found that the
journals were good at weeding out dross and publishing solid research. But
they failed — quite spectacularly — to pick up the papers that went to on
to garner the most citations.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lib.sun.ac.za/pipermail/irtalk/attachments/20141224/d55a0018/attachment.html>

More information about the IRTalk mailing list