[Irtalk] Peer review — reviewed : Nature News & Comment

[Hilton Gibson]

Using subsequent citations as a proxy for quality, the team found that the
journals were good at weeding out dross and publishing solid research. But
they failed — quite spectacularly — to pick up the papers that went to on
to garner the most citations.

http://www.nature.com/news/peer-review-reviewed-1.16629
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lib.sun.ac.za/pipermail/irtalk/attachments/20141224/d55a0018/attachment.html>