[Irtalk] FW: [WEB4LIB] Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact
Smith, Ina <firstname.lastname@example.org>
ismith at sun.ac.za
Sat Mar 24 10:24:41 SAST 2012
From: Smith, Ina <ismith at sun.ac.za>
Sent: 24 March 2012 10:01 AM
To: rraju at sun.ac.za; Gibson, H <hgibson at sun.ac.za>; michelle.willmers at uct.ac.za; fabteam at lists.lib.sun.ac.za
Subject: FW: [WEB4LIB] Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact
Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact
Jason Priem, Heather A. Piwowar, Bradley M. Hemminger
In growing numbers, scholars are integrating social media tools like blogs, Twitter, and Mendeley into their professional communications. The online, public nature of these tools exposes and reifies scholarly processes once hidden and ephemeral. Metrics based on this activities could inform broader, faster measures of impact, complementing traditional citation metrics. This study explores the properties of these social media-based metrics or "altmetrics", sampling 24,331 articles published by the Public Library of Science.
We find that that different indicators vary greatly in activity. Around 5% of sampled articles are cited in Wikipedia, while close to 80% have been included in at least one Mendeley library. There is, however, an encouraging diversity; a quarter of articles have nonzero data from five or more different sources. Correlation and factor analysis suggest citation and altmetrics indicators track related but distinct impacts, with neither able to describe the complete picture of scholarly use alone. There are moderate correlations between Mendeley and Web of Science citation, but many altmetric indicators seem to measure impact mostly orthogonal to citation. Articles cluster in ways that suggest five different impact "flavors", capturing impacts of different types on different audiences; for instance, some articles may be heavily read and saved by scholars but seldom cited. Together, these findings encourage more research into altmetrics as complements to traditional citation measures.
Source and Fulltext Available At
[ http://bit.ly/GVzRpQ ]
Hierdie e-pos mag vertroulike inligting bevat en mag regtens geprivilegeerd wees en is slegs bedoel vir die persoon aan wie dit geadresseer is. Indien u nie die bedoelde ontvanger is nie, word u hiermee in kennis gestel dat u hierdie dokument geensins mag gebruik, versprei of kopieer nie. Stel ook asseblief die sender onmiddellik per telefoon in kennis en vee die e-pos uit. Die Universiteit aanvaar nie aanspreeklikheid vir enige skade, verlies of uitgawe wat voortspruit uit hierdie e-pos en/of die oopmaak van enige lêers aangeheg by hierdie e-pos nie.
This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. The University does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or accessing any files attached to this e-mail.
More information about the Irtalk