<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.9600.18015"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT: 10pt Segoe UI; MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px">Can't remember how I came across this - maybe from Hilton - here's a one pager that describes how PLOS is contributing educational topic pages from its journal to wikipedia. This accomplishes two things: greater visibility for authors AND improving quality of wikipedia as source.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002446">http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002446</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>That's how alliances with Wikipedia should work.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Allison</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><IMG border=0 hspace=0 alt="" src="cid:EYMYFQGDYUEV.IMAGE_9.jpg" align=baseline></DIV>>>> Hilton Gibson <hilton.gibson@gmail.com> 2015/09/15 02:54 PM >>><BR></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Open-access advocate Michael Eisen — co-founder of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and supporter of numerous other ventures — criticized the deal on Twitter and dubbed it "WikiGate." <B><FONT color=#ff0000>His main fear is that those with access to ScienceDirect's database will add links to its content on Wikipedia articles.</FONT></B> When general users click one of the links, they'll be redirected to ScienceDirect's paywall and prompted to either buy a subscription to the site or pay a one-time access fee — which can run upwards of 10 pounds ($15 USD).
<DIV><BR><A href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/internet/wikipedia-under-fire-for-relationship-with-science-publisher/article/443790">http://www.digitaljournal.com/internet/wikipedia-under-fire-for-relationship-with-science-publisher/article/443790</A></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>