<div dir="ltr">On a popular electronic list for librarians, Rick Anderson of the University of Utah recently raised this idea about the systemic problem with university presses. His point was fairly simple and putatively non-controversial—<b><font color="#ff0000">“the question,” he wrote, referring to university-published monographs, “is whether they offer value to a large enough number of people to justify the cost and effort of publishing them in a traditional way”</font></b><div>
<br><a href="http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2014/06/opinion/peer-to-peer-review/can-libraries-help-stop-this-madness-peer-to-peer-review/">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2014/06/opinion/peer-to-peer-review/can-libraries-help-stop-this-madness-peer-to-peer-review/</a></div>
</div>